🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.